How does voice cloning technology create tension between production companies and artists’ heirs in the era of artificial intelligence?
The use of artificial intelligence in voice cloning has sparked a new wave of controversy, especially after production companies recreated the voice of the late French actor Alain Dorval in a new film starring Sylvester Stallone. Dorval had voiced Stallone’s characters in the French versions for over five decades, earning him widespread fame among cinema audiences in France. Following his death at the age of 77, producers turned to a British AI company to recreate his voice, prompting objections from his daughter.
Details of the voice recreation dispute
Dorval’s daughter, Aurore Bergé, holds a ministerial position in gender equality in France. She categorically denied that she consented to the widespread use of the AI voice technology. She stated that she only authorized an initial preliminary test, emphasizing that the agreement required her final approval before any use. After ElevenLabs and Lumiere Ventures announced that they had obtained family approval, it turned out not to be the case, prompting her to express her dissatisfaction publicly.
Read also: David Attenborough expresses strong objection to the AI cloning of his voice
The debate over ethical and legal voice quality
The promotional clip using AI technology to recreate Dorval’s voice drew criticism, with some users describing it as emotionless and robotic. This incident raises questions about the ethical dimensions of reviving the voices of deceased actors without the consent of their heirs or even without their prior consent before death. The controversy does not stop at the ethical aspect, but extends to legal and intellectual property aspects.
The expansion of the voice cloning phenomenon
Production companies are increasingly seeking to adopt voice cloning technologies, either to preserve the identity of famous figures or to extend actors’ contracts after their passing. However, this trend faces several objections. In another case, comedian Jenny Eclair objected to the use of the late British broadcaster Michael Parkinson’s voice, considering it a threat to living presenters. Similar issues have also emerged with well-known figures in cinema and television, such as actor Peter Sallis, whose voice was tied to the character Wallace in the Wallace & Gromit series.
Read also: Umm Kulthum and Abdel Halim Hafez come together in a new song (virtual experiment)
Conclusion and future implications
Undoubtedly, employing AI in the film and television industry opens up creative horizons, while simultaneously raising deeper questions about privacy, intellectual property, and moral rights. The controversy surrounding Alain Dorval’s case is expected to push concerned parties to seriously consider establishing clear regulatory frameworks that protect the rights of artists and their families. Amid these tensions, we may soon witness the emergence of international legislation setting strict conditions for the use of voice cloning technology.
The recent dispute over the use of Dorval’s voice highlights the need to draw legal and ethical boundaries in a world experiencing rapid technological advancements. While some view the matter as legitimate technological progress that allows us to preserve “artistic icons,” others see it as violating the sanctity of the deceased and potentially opening the door to the manipulation of cultural heritage. Only legislative frameworks and ethical agreements capable of regulating these practices will ultimately settle the debate.
